This
story appeared on Network World Fusion at
http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2000/00176903.html
'Net
Insider
The
importance of getting lost
By Scott Bradner
Network World,
12/04/00
I
was reading an article in some random mass media magazine the other day that
went on and on about how hard it was going to be in the future to get lost.
Global positioning satellite systems in cars, cell phones and soon, wrist
watches, will let us know at all times where we are.
My immediate
reaction was one of dread. Getting lost is a two-way street. If you don't know
where you are, then you can claim to be lost.
Also, if you cannot be
found, whoever is looking for you sees you as lost. I don't like the
implication of either meaning.
I've written often in this column
about my unease at the growing ability of everybody and their brother being
able to track your every movement. Getting a page to tell me that there is a
Starbucks two doors down on the left in the direction I'm going is not my idea
of fun. Nor is the idea that the phone company is keeping a record of wherever
you roam -- a record that can be turned over to the authorities on request.
Sure it would be easier for the cops to have a record of everyone's movements,
but is there anything left to the individual in that kind of world?
To
me, the other meaning of getting lost is almost as important. In the physical
world, never getting lost means never seeing most of what is around you. Other
than worrying about running out of gas, the best way to discover is to wander.
This
is also true in the world of invention. Clearly some types of invention, such
as the "invention" of the electric light, are best done by repeated
trials of slightly differing components. Thomas Edison was said to have tried
thousands of different materials for the filament in his light bulb before
finding one that would last.
But in many other cases you can't get
there that way.
Some traditional standards organizations seem to
think that you can even plan innovation.
The International
Telecommunication Union (ITU) has a quadrennial meeting during which it plans
what standards it is going to work on over the next four years. The ITU is
trying to be more flexible, but the quadrennial meeting is still a fixture.
This
mode of operation helped ensure the steady, if unimpressive, development of
telephone technology. But it did not produce the Internet.
Getting
lost in thought is still the best way to find something you didn't know was
there. Coming around a mental corner and finding a new way to look at a problem
is just as exciting as coming around a physical corner and finding an
unexpected vista.
I think I'll keep letting myself get lost from time
to time.
Disclaimer: Harvard has gotten lost many times in 360 years
and has developed a nice map collection, but the above vista seeking is mine.
All
contents copyright 1995-2002 Network World, Inc. http://www.nwfusion.com