This
story appeared on Network World Fusion at
http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2000/0925bradner.html
'Net
Insider:
Ensuring failure
By Scott Bradner
Network World,
09/25/00
News
Corp. and Boeing expect you to pay almost as much for Internet access on an
airplane as you pay for your seat. I'm no economist, but even I can predict
catastrophic failure when the plan is this dumb.
I fly a lot;
actually I fly rather too much. Trying to keep up with e-mail when I spend so
much time in airplanes is a pain. It usually means late nights and early
mornings at the hotel. The hotel connections are finally getting better. A
quarter of the hotels I stay at these days have "high-speed" Internet
access in the rooms. Just plug your laptop into the Ethernet jack, do a dance
with the Web browser to agree to pay for the access and away you go. This
service is priced at around $10 per day.
Spending all that time in the
plane still means lots of time catching up. It would be really nice if I could
get Internet access for reading e-mail and doing a bit of surfing while zipping
along at 35,000 feet.
Actually, there is a way to do this. You can
plug your laptop into the phone in the back of the seat in front of you and use
it to dial your favorite ISP. But this is slow and quite expensive, even at the
"special rate" of $1.99 per minute. A few years ago I got a special
deal, since discontinued, of a single, flat annual payment for all the
connection time you could use. I did use that quite a bit, and that got me to
bed a few hours earlier.
So I was happy to hear that Rupert Murdoch's
News Corp. had gotten together with Boeing to develop a satellite-based,
in-seat Internet access service. Even though the latency inherent in satellite-based
Internet access systems is far from ideal, it would still be helpful in keeping
me awake during early morning meetings because I could get more sleep.
A
few weeks ago The Wall Street Journal ran an article on the proposed service,
and I'm no longer so happy. According to the Journal, the service is projected
to cost between $17.50 and $25 per hour. That means on a six-hour,
cross-country flight you could easily pay more for the connectivity than for
your stay-over-Saturday-night fare. Note that pricing 'Net access the same as
phone service is not a technical requirement because data connections, unlike
voice ones, share the same circuit.
Because the equipment costs the
same for one or 10 users, pricing to ensure that the service providers get less
than one user seems rather brain-dead. The same service with a $10-per-flight
charge would get a lot of takers, but that would be too logical.
Disclaimer:
Officially Harvard does not do "brain-dead," but . . . In any case,
the above rant is mine.
All contents copyright 1995-2002 Network
World, Inc. http://www.nwfusion.com