The following text is copyright 1994 by
Network World, permission is hearby given for reproduction, as long as
attribution is given and this notice is included.
Why We Can't Find Where
What Is.
By: Scott Bradner
One of the legendary (if
one can use that word for an industry just in its infancy) problems with the
Internet has been difficulty in locating people, services and resources
scattered without discernible pattern across the world-wide network. Over the
long term, one can expect that this problem will be solved in a way analogous
to the white and yellow pages directories provided by the phone companies. But
this is a bit harder in the Internet than for the phone companies for a number
of reasons.
The market is far more
split between service providers than is the regional telephone market. This
means that the service providers themselves do not have the scale to make their
information universal enough to be meaningful and that directory services will
most likely have to be provided by independent ventures.
There is currently no
well accepted electronic interface to directory services. The OSI directory
services (aka X.400) would be the logical candidate but in the years that the
standards have been available the software that supports it has not been
leaping onto or off of store shelves.
There is no common
access control and billing process that would allow any independent directory
venture to collect for its services, i.e. nothing like the '900' services in the
phone system. ( To locate a good time gopher to 1-900-HOT-BITS.)
Finally, as the MCI
commercial so enigmatically put it "there is no there, it is all
here". Considering the type and speed of the Internet infrastructure, one
can use a service based 3000 miles away just as easily as one down the block
and can often not tell the difference. As a point of reference, the slowest
path between my desk at Harvard and a desk at Stanford is a 10Mbps Ethernet.
Any directory service would have to be able to provide information about
services everywhere in the world. This is a bit of a scale and logistical issue
involving, among other things, a surfeit of natural languages.
Directory services will
come in time, but meanwhile some service providers have grown tired of waiting
and are trying to use the Internet the way that telemarketers use the phone
system -- they send out unsolicited advertising. It's not just service
providers. Messages that are best categorized as advertisements have appeared
with subjects including Ethernet interfaces, bulletin boards, bookstores and
even the end of the world.
This can be quite a
problem. In the telephone world there is a limit to the number of calls you can
make simultaneously There is no such limit on the Internet. One can send a
message that will go to literally millions of people and, because of flat rate
pricing, doing this will cost no more than sending one letter.
More on this in a future
column. Meanwhile I'll leave you with a somewhat stretched analogy.
Experiencing unsolicited advertising on the information highway is a bit like
driving a convertible under a flock of sea gulls on old Route One. You hope
that you are lucky enough to have the top up whenever it happens and even then,
it is not the high point of one's day.
Gee, I wish that the
would stop paying those Olympic sportscasters by the word.
Disclaimer: (from R.
Kevin Oberman) Don't take this too seriously. I just like to improve my typing.
sob@harvard.edu