The following text is copyright 1994 by
Network World, permission is hearby given for reproduction, as long as
attribution is given and this notice is included.
One That Did and One
that Did Not
By: Scott Bradner
In the last few weeks
two companies made announcements that showed both the promise and problems of
the corporate understanding of the Internet.
Digital announced that
you can now place orders for its full product line via the Internet. Digital
(it's not DEC anymore), like some of its competitors, has been using the
Internet to communicate with its current and potential customers for quite a
while. Over the years I've solicited and received many quotations via the
Internet from the Digital sales people assigned to Harvard. Fortune magazine
(in a quite good story on the use of the Internet by business in the March 7th
issue) reports that Digital sold over $5 million worth of computers to people
who had accepted their offer to take a remote test drive of an Alpha
workstation via the Internet.
Given that background,
ordering via the Internet is not all that surprising a development, but a
welcome one none the less. As of now, this service is just for research and
education customers but I hope that it will expand as they realize that
commercial Internet connectivity is already here and growing. Speaking of
growing, the demand has been so high in the two weeks since the announcement
that Digital has already had to reengineer the support for it and use a new
address (telnet to telnet.educonnect.digital.com)
Ziff Davis announced
that they would be launching ZiffNet. In all of the announcement stories in all
of the trade journals I did not see one mention of the Internet. Remember, this
is the same Ziff Davis that brings you Networld + Interop, the quintessential
TCP/IP and Internet trade show. Now I'm surely not going to knock the trade
show, and much less the tutorials since I get a cut whenever someone takes
mine, but you would think that a company with as much in-house Internet
expertise would have built a new service around the Internet. They may have,
and the message just did not come across in the announcements but it seems like
a bit of an omission.
This represents two
extremes. On the one hand we have a company that is doing what it can to adapt
to the new paradigms available to business today and on the other, a company
that seems from its product announcement to be daunted by the challenges and
decides it would rather build its own environment than explore the boundaries
of what exists. (This reminds me of an old headache commercial that had a hook
line of "Mother, please! I'd rather do it myself.")
Clearly, as I've said
before, security and other issues make the business use of the Internet, and
the touted "Information Highway" that it is growing, a non-trivial
venture. But it will be just these companies that face these challenges who
will be the winners of the information future. Rupert Murdock understood this
when he chose to invest in Delphi, a bulletin board that was, and is,
aggressively expanding its Internet ties, over a number of others where the
Internet was 'something out there' that they did not understand.
Not all colonizers of
the information highway will be winners; it is still quite easy to build a gas
station on a cul-de-sac. But those technology companies that are reluctant to
explore will have a hard time when they finally wake up.
Gee, I wish they would
stop paying those Olympic 'sportscasters' by the word.
Disclaimer: (from Ran
Atkinson) Opinions expressed are only those of the author. His employer has not
endorsed these personal opinions and the author is never authorized to speak
"officially" (whatever that means).
sob@harvard.edu